SYSTEM FOR ASSESSING MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING SKILLS IN PRIMARY EDUCATION

Abstract

Disclosed is a system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education. A user interface presents mathematical problems to a user, and an input device receives problem-solving responses. A database stores mathematical problems, responses, and performance data. A processor analyzes problem-solving responses based on predefined criteria to generate assessment data. A feedback generator provides performance feedback to the user based on such assessment data. A reporting system generates reports based on said assessment data for viewing by an administrator. The system enables individualized learning assessments and tracks user progress over time, offering adaptive problem difficulty based on user performance and generating detailed progress reports. The system is capable of storing, analyzing, and reporting data related to a user's problem-solving skills in real-time.

Specification

Description:Field of the Invention


The present disclosure generally relates to educational systems. Further, the present disclosure particularly relates to systems for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education.
Background
The background description includes information that may be useful in understanding the present invention. It is not an admission that any of the information provided herein is prior art or relevant to the presently claimed invention, or that any publication specifically or implicitly referenced is prior art.
Educational systems, particularly in the context of primary education, have traditionally focused on assessing students' knowledge and abilities through standardised tests and periodic evaluations. The assessment of mathematical problem-solving skills has been an essential aspect of educational development. Conventional systems and techniques utilised in assessing such skills have largely relied on manual grading, subjective evaluation methods, and static paper-based examinations. These methods, while serving basic purposes, have often been associated with various drawbacks.
One of the widely employed techniques for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills involves the manual correction of tests or exams administered on paper. Teachers typically evaluate students' problem-solving processes and assign scores based on a set marking scheme. However, such a method can be prone to inconsistencies, given the potential for subjective interpretation by the evaluator. Furthermore, manual assessments often lead to delays in providing feedback to the students. The absence of timely feedback may hinder a student's ability to improve performance in subsequent tasks or exercises. Moreover, manual methods fail to adapt to the individual student's learning pace, making it difficult to identify the specific areas where improvement is needed.
Another commonly utilised system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills involves computer-based testing environments. Such systems are generally based on multiple-choice questions or fill-in-the-blank problems. While such systems provide some level of automation in assessing mathematical abilities, the limitations lie in the rigidity of the problem types. The assessment often lacks the depth required to evaluate the student's true understanding of mathematical concepts. Furthermore, many such systems focus on end-results rather than the process used by the student to arrive at said results, thus failing to provide meaningful feedback on the problem-solving approach. As a result, students are not adequately informed about the errors in their thinking or approach, which limits opportunities for targeted improvement.
Another significant drawback of traditional systems, whether manual or computer-based, is the limited ability to track and store student progress over time. Conventional methods typically focus on a single assessment or exam period, lacking the means to compile and analyze longitudinal data for each student. The absence of a system to store, retrieve, and analyze performance data over multiple assessments makes it challenging to track trends in a student's mathematical development. Without such insights, educators may find it difficult to tailor future lessons or interventions to address individual students' needs.
Additionally, traditional educational systems are typically unable to provide adaptive learning paths for students. Students with varying levels of mathematical proficiency are often presented with the same set of problems, regardless of their individual strengths and weaknesses. Consequently, advanced students may find the problems too simple, leading to a lack of engagement, while weaker students may find the problems too difficult, resulting in frustration and disengagement from learning.
Moreover, existing systems frequently do not allow educators or administrators to generate detailed reports that present a holistic view of a student's performance. Such systems usually limit reporting to numerical scores or grades, without offering insights into the specific areas of mathematical competence or problem-solving strategies. The absence of meaningful reporting mechanisms prevents educators from making data-driven decisions aimed at improving student outcomes.
In light of the above discussion, there exists an urgent need for solutions that overcome the problems associated with conventional systems and/or techniques for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education.
Summary
The following presents a simplified summary of various aspects of this disclosure in order to provide a basic understanding of such aspects. This summary is not an extensive overview of all contemplated aspects, and is intended to neither identify key or critical elements nor delineate the scope of such aspects. Its purpose is to present some concepts of this disclosure in a simplified form as a prelude to the more detailed description that is presented later.
The following paragraphs provide additional support for the claims of the subject application.
An objective of the present disclosure is to provide a system that enables effective assessment of mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education. The system of the present disclosure aims to offer real-time feedback and detailed reporting for both users and administrators to improve learning outcomes.
In an aspect, the present disclosure provides a system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills, comprising a user interface to present mathematical problems, an input device to receive problem-solving responses, a database to store mathematical problems, responses, and performance data, and a processor to analyze said responses based on predefined criteria and generate assessment data. The system further includes a feedback generator to provide performance feedback and a reporting system to generate assessment reports for administrator review.
Furthermore, the system enables tracking of user progress over time by storing individual progress data. Moreover, said system adapts the difficulty level of mathematical problems presented to users based on the assessment data generated. The system also provides real-time feedback during problem-solving sessions and supports direct input of mathematical symbols through a touch-sensitive display.
The system further categorises mathematical problems into distinct skill categories and generates detailed reports, including graphical representations of user progress. Additionally, personalised learning recommendations are provided based on the user's strengths and areas for improvement. Common errors in user responses are detected, and targeted feedback is provided for corrective learning. Finally, administrators can customize reports based on various criteria, including time periods, problem categories, and performance benchmarks.

Brief Description of the Drawings


The features and advantages of the present disclosure would be more clearly understood from the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
FIG. 1 illustrates a system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.
FIG. 2 illustrates class diagram of a system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
In the following detailed description of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying drawings that form a part hereof, and in which is shown, by way of illustration, specific embodiments in which the invention may be practiced. In the drawings, like numerals describe substantially similar components throughout the several views. These embodiments are described in sufficient detail to claim those skilled in the art to practice the invention. Other embodiments may be utilized and structural, logical, and electrical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention. The following detailed description is, therefore, not to be taken in a limiting sense, and the scope of the present invention is defined only by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.
The use of the terms "a" and "an" and "the" and "at least one" and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The use of the term "at least one" followed by a list of one or more items (for example, "at least one of A and B") is to be construed to mean one item selected from the listed items (A or B) or any combination of two or more of the listed items (A and B), unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms "comprising," "having," "including," and "containing" are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning "including, but not limited to,") unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., "such as") provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
Pursuant to the "Detailed Description" section herein, whenever an element is explicitly associated with a specific numeral for the first time, such association shall be deemed consistent and applicable throughout the entirety of the "Detailed Description" section, unless otherwise expressly stated or contradicted by the context.
As used herein, the term "user interface" refers to any interface that facilitates interaction between a user and the system for presenting mathematical problems. The user interface may comprise visual displays, such as digital screens, for presenting said problems, and may be integrated into devices including computers, tablets, or smartphones. The user interface may also include elements like graphical buttons, text fields, and menus that guide the user through the problem-solving process. The user interface is operatively connected to other system components to enable real-time interaction and feedback between the user and the system. Additionally, the user interface may allow for the selection and presentation of various types of mathematical problems, ranging from simple arithmetic to more complex word problems. Furthermore, the user interface may be designed to accommodate users of varying age groups and learning levels, with options for language preference, difficulty settings, and other customization features.
As used herein, the term "input device" refers to any device that receives problem-solving responses from the user and transmits said responses to the system for further analysis. The input device may include a variety of hardware such as keyboards, touchscreens, or styluses, depending on the nature of the user interface. Said input device is operatively connected to the user interface, enabling the user to input mathematical symbols, numerical values, and written responses directly into the system. Furthermore, the input device may support multiple modes of input, allowing the user to select between typing, handwriting, or selecting answers from a set of predefined choices. The input device may also be capable of detecting and interpreting gestures or other forms of input commonly used in touch-sensitive technologies. Additionally, the input device operates in real-time, ensuring that user inputs are captured accurately and promptly for subsequent analysis.
As used herein, the term "database" refers to any system for storing and organizing data, particularly a plurality of mathematical problems, problem-solving responses, and associated performance data. The database stores said mathematical problems in a structured manner, enabling efficient retrieval and presentation of problems to the user based on specific criteria such as difficulty level or category. The database is also responsible for storing the user's responses and corresponding performance data, including scores, completion times, and error rates. Furthermore, the database may store historical data that tracks a user's progress over time, allowing for longitudinal analysis of said user's problem-solving skills. The database may be operatively connected to the processor to facilitate the storage and retrieval of data for real-time assessment. Additionally, the database may support secure data storage protocols, ensuring that all stored information remains confidential and protected from unauthorized access.
As used herein, the term "processor" refers to any computational unit responsible for analyzing the problem-solving responses entered by the user and generating corresponding assessment data. The processor is operatively connected to the database and the input device to receive said responses and predefined criteria against which such responses are evaluated. The processor analyzes user responses based on various mathematical and logical parameters, such as correctness, efficiency, and method of approach. Furthermore, the processor may perform complex calculations and comparisons to generate comprehensive assessment data, which may include scores, error identification, and response patterns. The processor operates in real-time to ensure prompt analysis of user responses, enabling immediate feedback generation. Additionally, the processor may employ adaptive techniques to modify the difficulty of problems presented to the user based on prior performance, thereby tailoring the system to individual learning needs.
As used herein, the term "feedback generator" refers to any component of the system responsible for delivering performance feedback to the user based on the assessment data generated by the processor. The feedback generator is operatively connected to said processor and may provide various forms of feedback, including textual, graphical, or audio-based information, depending on the user's preferences and system settings. Said feedback may include detailed performance reports, highlighting both strengths and areas requiring improvement, and may be provided in real-time during problem-solving sessions or upon completion of said sessions. The feedback generator may also be designed to support various levels of feedback, from basic correctness indicators to more comprehensive explanations of errors and recommended approaches for improvement. Additionally, the feedback generator may personalize feedback based on a user's prior performance, allowing for targeted instructional guidance.
As used herein, the term "reporting system" refers to any system responsible for generating reports based on the assessment data analyzed by the processor. Said reporting system is operatively connected to the processor and may generate various types of reports, including detailed summaries of user performance, progress over time, and comparisons across different problem categories. The reporting system is intended for viewing by administrators, teachers, or other stakeholders responsible for monitoring and assessing the user's mathematical development. Reports generated by said reporting system may include visual representations such as charts or graphs to facilitate understanding of complex performance metrics. Furthermore, the reporting system may be customized to generate reports at specific intervals or based on specified criteria, such as problem category, time period, or performance threshold. Additionally, the reporting system may support secure data sharing with authorized users while ensuring data confidentiality.
FIG. 1 illustrates a system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. In an embodiment, the user interface is configured to present mathematical problems to a user and facilitates interaction between said user and the system. Said user interface may comprise various elements, such as graphical representations, menus, or displays, which visually present mathematical problems. Said user interface may operate through a variety of hardware platforms, including desktop computers, laptops, tablets, or mobile devices. Additionally, said user interface may include both visual and auditory components to enhance the user's understanding of the presented problems. Mathematical problems may range from basic arithmetic to more advanced problems involving logic, reasoning, or word-based problems. The user interface allows said user to navigate through multiple problems, providing step-by-step instructions or hints when required. Furthermore, said user interface may allow customization based on user preferences, enabling the selection of difficulty levels, problem types, or even the language of instruction. Said user interface may also display feedback generated by other system components in real-time, providing immediate responses to a user's inputs. Said interface is operatively connected to an input device that enables user interaction with said system.
In an embodiment, the input device is operatively connected to said user interface and is designed to receive mathematical problem-solving responses from said user. Said input device may be implemented through various forms of hardware, such as keyboards, touchscreens, styluses, or voice recognition systems. Said input device allows said user to input responses, including numerical values, symbols, or text, depending on the nature of said mathematical problem presented by said user interface. In some cases, said input device may interpret different forms of input, such as handwriting or touch gestures, providing flexibility in how responses are entered. Said input device is operatively linked to other components of the system, ensuring real-time transmission of said responses for further analysis. The input device operates without requiring complex steps, allowing users of varying skill levels to interact easily with the system.
In an embodiment, the database stores a plurality of mathematical problems, corresponding problem-solving responses, and associated performance data. Said database is structured to allow efficient storage and retrieval of information, maintaining organization by categorizing problems based on difficulty, topic, or other predefined parameters. Additionally, said database stores the user's responses to mathematical problems, recording said user's inputs along with timestamps or other relevant data. Performance data, such as accuracy rates, completion times, and progress over time, is also stored within said database. The database operates securely, ensuring that all data remains confidential and can be accessed only by authorized users. Said database may further store historical data to track a user's long-term progress, enabling the identification of patterns or trends. The database is operatively connected to said processor and other system components, allowing seamless data transmission for analysis or reporting purposes.
In an embodiment, the processor is operatively connected to said database and said input device and is designed to analyze problem-solving responses based on predefined criteria. Said processor may employ a variety of methods to assess the correctness, efficiency, or approach of said user's responses. For example, said processor may compare user responses to stored solutions, identifying errors or inconsistencies. Additionally, said processor may analyze the steps taken by said user to arrive at the solution, providing a comprehensive evaluation beyond simple correctness. The processor may further calculate performance metrics such as speed, accuracy, or problem-solving efficiency, storing said data for future reference or analysis. The processor operates in real-time, ensuring that said user receives immediate feedback based on the responses entered. Furthermore, said processor may adapt to the user's skill level, presenting problems of varying difficulty based on performance data.
In an embodiment, the feedback generator is operatively connected to said processor and is designed to provide performance feedback to said user. Said feedback generator may provide feedback in a variety of forms, including visual, auditory, or textual formats, based on the analysis performed by said processor. Said feedback generator may offer detailed explanations of errors, suggested corrections, or additional guidance to assist said user in understanding mathematical concepts. Furthermore, said feedback generator may personalize feedback based on the user's performance history, tailoring said feedback to target specific areas of weakness or reinforce strengths. In certain embodiments, said feedback generator may provide real-time responses, offering immediate feedback as the user progresses through mathematical problems. Additionally, the feedback may be adjusted to match the user's preferences or learning style, allowing for customization.
In an embodiment, the reporting system is operatively connected to said processor and is designed to generate reports based on the assessment data. Said reports may be viewed by an administrator, such as a teacher or parent, to monitor the user's progress. The reporting system may generate detailed summaries of said user's performance, offering insights into areas of strength and weakness. Additionally, said reporting system may include visual elements, such as graphs or charts, to represent the user's progress over time. The reporting system may also allow administrators to customize said reports by specifying particular performance metrics, problem types, or time periods for analysis. Reports generated may be stored securely and accessed by authorized individuals only, ensuring data privacy. Said reporting system enables the monitoring of multiple users, allowing administrators to assess group performance or compare individual users.
In an embodiment, the database is configured to store individual progress data for the user, including historical performance trends. The database may track various performance metrics over time, such as accuracy rates, completion times, and the number of attempts required to solve particular problems. This individual progress data enables the system to maintain a comprehensive record of each user's development in mathematical problem-solving. Historical performance data stored in the database allows educators or administrators to view trends in a user's learning journey, providing insights into both improvement and areas of difficulty. The database may categorize said data by problem type, difficulty level, or time periods, offering flexibility in how said data is stored and retrieved. Additionally, the database may store supplementary information, such as feedback received, recommendations provided by the system, and data related to specific learning sessions. Said database is structured to allow for efficient access to individual progress data and may be integrated with other system components to provide detailed reports or adapt future mathematical problem presentations based on past performance.
In an embodiment, the processor is configured to adapt the difficulty level of the mathematical problems presented to the user based on assessment data. The processor evaluates the user's past performance, including factors such as accuracy, speed, and the number of attempts required to solve problems. Based on said data, the processor may determine whether the current difficulty level is appropriate for the user's skill level. If the user consistently solves problems correctly and quickly, the processor may increase the difficulty of subsequent problems to present a more challenging set of tasks. Conversely, if the user demonstrates difficulty with current problems, the processor may present easier problems to help build foundational skills. The adaptive nature of the problem presentation allows the system to personalize the learning experience, ensuring that the user is neither overwhelmed nor under-challenged. The processor may also analyze trends over time, adjusting difficulty dynamically as the user progresses through various mathematical concepts.
In an embodiment, the feedback generator is configured to provide real-time feedback to the user during problem-solving sessions. Said feedback may include information on the correctness of the user's responses, error identification, and hints to guide the user toward the correct solution. The feedback generator may deliver feedback immediately after a user enters a response, ensuring that the user receives instant guidance and correction. Said feedback may take various forms, such as visual indicators (e.g., green for correct, red for incorrect), text-based explanations, or audio prompts. Real-time feedback helps the user understand mistakes while solving a problem, allowing immediate rectification and reinforcing learning. The feedback generator may also offer step-by-step guidance on more complex problems, breaking down the problem-solving process into manageable parts. Said real-time feedback helps maintain the user's engagement and focus by providing timely responses and encouragement throughout the session.
In an embodiment, the input device comprises a touch-sensitive display that enables the user to directly input mathematical symbols and expressions. Said display may include a virtual keyboard or handwriting recognition interface to allow the user to enter numbers, symbols, and operations commonly used in mathematical problem-solving. The touch-sensitive nature of the display enables intuitive interaction, allowing the user to write mathematical expressions using a stylus or a finger. Said display may support multiple input formats, such as tapping on a virtual number pad or drawing out complex equations. The input device provides immediate visual feedback on the screen as the user inputs responses, helping the user review and adjust responses in real-time. The touch-sensitive display may also allow the user to interact with problem elements directly, such as dragging and dropping numbers or symbols into place within a mathematical equation. Said input device provides flexibility and ease of use for users of all skill levels.
In an embodiment, the processor is configured to classify mathematical problems into distinct categories based on a predefined taxonomy of mathematical skills. The processor may analyze each problem and assign it to a specific category, such as arithmetic, geometry, algebra, or word problems. Said classification allows the system to organize problems into distinct skill sets, enabling the user to focus on specific areas of mathematics. The processor may further subdivide said categories by difficulty level or problem type, ensuring that problems are appropriately categorized based on both content and complexity. Said classification enables the system to present a balanced range of problems, ensuring that the user receives practice in multiple areas of mathematical problem-solving. The predefined taxonomy may be structured to align with educational standards or curriculum goals, providing educators with a clear framework for evaluating a user's competence in various mathematical domains.
In an embodiment, the reporting system is configured to generate detailed reports that include graphical representations of the user's progress across multiple mathematical problem-solving categories. Said reports may include charts, graphs, or other visual representations that illustrate trends in the user's accuracy, problem-solving speed, and skill development over time. The reporting system may categorize performance data by mathematical skill type, allowing administrators to view the user's progress in areas such as arithmetic, geometry, or algebra. Additionally, said reports may display historical performance data, showing improvements or declines in specific skill sets. The reporting system enables the customization of reports based on various parameters, including time periods, problem categories, or specific performance metrics. Graphical representations provide a clear and concise overview of said data, making it easier for educators or administrators to assess the user's overall progress and identify areas that may require additional focus or intervention.
In an embodiment, the feedback generator is configured to provide personalized learning recommendations to the user based on said user's strengths and areas for improvement. Said feedback generator may analyze performance data to identify patterns in the user's problem-solving behavior, such as frequent mistakes or consistently strong performance in specific areas. Based on said analysis, the feedback generator may recommend targeted practice in weaker areas, suggesting additional problems or exercises to reinforce learning. Conversely, said feedback generator may recommend more advanced problems in areas where the user demonstrates strength, helping to accelerate the user's progress. Said personalized recommendations may be presented as part of the feedback provided after each problem-solving session or delivered periodically based on overall performance trends. Said recommendations are tailored to the individual user's needs, ensuring that the learning experience is both focused and efficient.
In an embodiment, the processor is configured to detect common errors in the user's problem-solving responses and generate targeted feedback aimed at correcting such errors. Said processor may analyze patterns in the user's responses, identifying recurring mistakes such as calculation errors, incorrect use of mathematical symbols, or misinterpretation of problem instructions. Once said errors are detected, the processor generates specific feedback that addresses the nature of the mistake, offering explanations or hints on how to correct said errors. The processor may also provide suggestions on alternative approaches to problem-solving, encouraging the user to rethink or revise said problem-solving strategy. The processor's ability to detect common errors allows the system to offer highly targeted feedback, helping the user avoid repeated mistakes and improving overall learning outcomes. Said targeted feedback may be delivered immediately after each problem is solved or as part of a broader feedback report.
In an embodiment, the reporting system is configured to allow the administrator to customize said reports based on specified criteria, including time periods, problem categories, and performance benchmarks. Said customization options allow administrators to generate reports that focus on specific aspects of the user's performance, providing a tailored view of the user's progress. For example, the administrator may generate a report that shows the user's performance in arithmetic over the past month or compare said user's accuracy rates in different problem categories. The reporting system may also allow the administrator to set performance benchmarks, providing a way to evaluate whether the user meets or exceeds specific educational goals. Said customization capabilities give administrators the flexibility to monitor individual users or groups of users, making it easier to assess learning outcomes and make data-driven decisions regarding future instruction. Reports can be generated at regular intervals or on demand based on the administrator's requirements.
FIG. 2 illustrates class diagram of a system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education, in accordance with the embodiments of the present disclosure. The system comprises multiple interconnected components. At the core is a User Interface, which presents mathematical problems to the user. The user interacts with the system through an Input Device, allowing direct input of problem-solving responses. These responses are stored, along with the problems and performance data, in a Database designed for data organization and retrieval. A Processor is operatively connected to both the database and input device, analyzing the user's responses based on predefined criteria and generating assessment data. The processor's analysis triggers a Feedback Generator, which provides real-time performance feedback to the user. Additionally, a Reporting Module processes assessment data and generates detailed reports for administrators to monitor the user's progress. The system components work together to facilitate continuous assessment and personalized feedback, ensuring an adaptive learning environment for students to enhance their mathematical skills.
In an embodiment, the user interface configured to present mathematical problems to the user provides an interactive platform that enhances engagement in mathematical learning. By delivering a wide variety of problem types, the user interface enables the user to practice skills across multiple areas of mathematics, such as arithmetic, geometry, and algebra. The interface may also present problems in various formats, including text-based, graphical, or visual representations, which caters to diverse learning styles. Additionally, the interactive nature of the user interface allows for immediate response to user inputs, creating a dynamic learning environment. The configuration of said user interface allows for personalized problem sets that can be adjusted according to the user's educational needs, making the system adaptable to different age groups and proficiency levels. The integration with other system components allows for seamless communication between the user interface and the feedback generator, creating a cohesive experience.
In an embodiment, the input device operatively connected to the user interface enables the user to efficiently submit responses to the presented problems. By supporting different input methods, such as touch, keyboard, or stylus, the input device accommodates various interaction styles, ensuring flexibility for users of different ages and skill levels. This versatility enables the system to be used in different educational contexts, including classrooms, remote learning environments, or individual study sessions. The immediate transfer of user inputs to the system allows real-time processing, enabling instant feedback from the feedback generator and processor. The ability to input complex mathematical expressions, including fractions, equations, and geometric symbols, adds depth to the system's applicability, allowing users to engage with advanced mathematical concepts. The connection between the input device and the processor enables the system to analyze user responses promptly and accurately, ensuring that input errors are minimized.
In an embodiment, the database configured to store a plurality of mathematical problems, responses, and associated performance data enhances the system's ability to track user progress over time. By maintaining a repository of mathematical problems, the database enables the system to present a diverse range of questions, categorized by difficulty, subject matter, or problem type. The ability to store performance data, such as accuracy, completion time, and the number of attempts, provides the system with a comprehensive understanding of the user's learning progression. Additionally, storing problem-solving responses allows the system to review and analyze specific user behavior, identifying patterns or recurring errors. The database also supports longitudinal data storage, which is essential for tracking improvements or regressions in user performance over extended periods. The database's connection to the reporting system enables detailed report generation that reflects the user's problem-solving trends and provides educators with valuable insights into individual learning progress.
In an embodiment, the processor, which is operatively connected to the database and the input device, is responsible for analyzing user responses and generating assessment data based on predefined criteria. The processor evaluates the accuracy of responses, tracks the efficiency of problem-solving strategies, and generates metrics that reflect the user's overall performance. By analyzing this data, the processor can identify areas where the user excels or struggles, enabling targeted feedback. The processor's capability to operate in real-time ensures that responses are evaluated immediately after submission, minimizing delays in feedback generation. Furthermore, the processor adapts to varying levels of complexity in user responses, accommodating different mathematical problem types. The processor's ability to assess user performance based on a range of criteria, such as speed, accuracy, and method, provides a more comprehensive evaluation of mathematical skills compared to traditional assessment methods.
In an embodiment, the feedback generator operatively connected to the processor provides immediate performance feedback to the user based on assessment data. Said feedback generator can present feedback in multiple formats, such as visual, auditory, or text-based messages, depending on user preference or educational setting. The feedback generator offers corrective feedback when errors are made, providing explanations or hints that guide the user toward the correct solution. In more advanced settings, the feedback generator may break down the problem-solving process into smaller steps, helping the user understand complex mathematical procedures. By delivering feedback in real-time, the system enhances the learning experience, allowing the user to make adjustments during the problem-solving process. Additionally, the feedback generator can reinforce positive behavior by acknowledging correct responses, promoting confidence and motivation in the user.
In an embodiment, the reporting system generates detailed reports that allow administrators or educators to track the user's progress across various mathematical problem-solving categories. The reporting system compiles data from the processor and database, transforming raw performance metrics into clear, actionable insights. The reports can display performance trends over time, categorizing the user's skills by areas such as problem type, accuracy, and completion speed. By including graphical representations such as charts or graphs, the reporting system enables easy identification of strengths and areas requiring further development. The reporting system may also provide summaries of key performance indicators, facilitating quick decision-making for educators. Reports can be customized to meet specific needs, such as focusing on particular timeframes, mathematical skills, or user groups, thus supporting tailored educational interventions.
In an embodiment, the database configured to store individual progress data and historical per












I/We Claims


A system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education, comprising:
a user interface configured to present mathematical problems to a user;
an input device operatively connected to said user interface for receiving problem-solving responses from said user;
a database for storing a plurality of mathematical problems, said problem-solving responses, and associated performance data;
a processor operatively connected to said database and said input device, wherein said processor is configured to analyze said problem-solving responses based on predefined criteria and generate assessment data;
a feedback generator operatively connected to said processor, wherein said feedback generator is configured to provide performance feedback to said user based on said assessment data; and
a reporting module operatively connected to said processor and configured to generate reports based on said assessment data for viewing by an administrator.
The system of claim 1, wherein said database is configured to store individual progress data for said user, including historical performance trends.
The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is further configured to adapt the difficulty level of said mathematical problems presented to said user based on said assessment data.
The system of claim 1, wherein said feedback generator is configured to provide real-time feedback to said user during problem-solving sessions.
The system of claim 1, wherein said input device comprises a touch-sensitive display configured to enable direct input of mathematical symbols and expressions by said user.
The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is further configured to classify said mathematical problems into distinct categories based on a predefined taxonomy of mathematical skills.
The system of claim 1, wherein said reporting module is configured to generate detailed reports that include graphical representations of said user's progress across multiple mathematical problem-solving categories.
The system of claim 1, wherein said feedback generator is further configured to provide personalized learning recommendations to said user based on said user's strengths and areas for improvement.
The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is further configured to detect common errors in said user's problem-solving responses and generate targeted feedback aimed at correcting such errors.
The system of claim 1, wherein said reporting module is configured to allow said administrator to customize said reports based on specified criteria, including time periods, problem categories, and performance benchmarks.




Disclosed is a system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education. A user interface presents mathematical problems to a user, and an input device receives problem-solving responses. A database stores mathematical problems, responses, and performance data. A processor analyzes problem-solving responses based on predefined criteria to generate assessment data. A feedback generator provides performance feedback to the user based on such assessment data. A reporting system generates reports based on said assessment data for viewing by an administrator. The system enables individualized learning assessments and tracks user progress over time, offering adaptive problem difficulty based on user performance and generating detailed progress reports. The system is capable of storing, analyzing, and reporting data related to a user's problem-solving skills in real-time.

, Claims:I/We Claims


A system for assessing mathematical problem-solving skills in primary education, comprising:
a user interface configured to present mathematical problems to a user;
an input device operatively connected to said user interface for receiving problem-solving responses from said user;
a database for storing a plurality of mathematical problems, said problem-solving responses, and associated performance data;
a processor operatively connected to said database and said input device, wherein said processor is configured to analyze said problem-solving responses based on predefined criteria and generate assessment data;
a feedback generator operatively connected to said processor, wherein said feedback generator is configured to provide performance feedback to said user based on said assessment data; and
a reporting module operatively connected to said processor and configured to generate reports based on said assessment data for viewing by an administrator.
The system of claim 1, wherein said database is configured to store individual progress data for said user, including historical performance trends.
The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is further configured to adapt the difficulty level of said mathematical problems presented to said user based on said assessment data.
The system of claim 1, wherein said feedback generator is configured to provide real-time feedback to said user during problem-solving sessions.
The system of claim 1, wherein said input device comprises a touch-sensitive display configured to enable direct input of mathematical symbols and expressions by said user.
The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is further configured to classify said mathematical problems into distinct categories based on a predefined taxonomy of mathematical skills.
The system of claim 1, wherein said reporting module is configured to generate detailed reports that include graphical representations of said user's progress across multiple mathematical problem-solving categories.
The system of claim 1, wherein said feedback generator is further configured to provide personalized learning recommendations to said user based on said user's strengths and areas for improvement.
The system of claim 1, wherein said processor is further configured to detect common errors in said user's problem-solving responses and generate targeted feedback aimed at correcting such errors.
The system of claim 1, wherein said reporting module is configured to allow said administrator to customize said reports based on specified criteria, including time periods, problem categories, and performance benchmarks.

Documents