image
image
user-login
Patent search/

DEEP SOCKET DENTAL IMPLANT CAPSULE

search

Patent Search in India

  • tick

    Extensive patent search conducted by a registered patent agent

  • tick

    Patent search done by experts in under 48hrs

₹999

₹399

Talk to expert

DEEP SOCKET DENTAL IMPLANT CAPSULE

ORDINARY APPLICATION

Published

date

Filed on 28 October 2024

Abstract

ABSTRACT As the world is embracing technology, dental technology is merging with artificial intelligence. Dentists are striving to perfect the art of placing dental implants. Implants for the rehabilitation and retention of dental and facial prostheses have graduated from a phase of wishful thinking to one of the most gratifying experiences for patients and treating fraternity alike. Implants and restorations supported by implants have a good long-term survival percentage. Complications and implant failure, which can still happen, are seen by many clinicians as significant barriers to implant treatment. Implant therapy still involves a biological healing and integration process despite recent advancements. These biological processes are complex and may be hampered by local or systemic factors, which could result in problems and implant failure. For the implant surgeon and dental professional, it is crucial to manage patients who have certain risk factors and be able to address potential complications and failure. An endosseous implant, or an endodontic endosseous implant, is a type of endosteal implant that is meant to mimic the natural root of a tooth by. using a vertical column of bone to anchor the dental implant hardware. Endosseous implants are surgically placed inside the natural jawbone and allowed to heal before placing the artificial tooth or crown on the implant hardware. Since children under the age of 16 are still developing and the shape, stze, and density of their jawbone is still changing, endosseous implants are typically only recommended for patients over the age of 16 to 18, depending on individual dental practice policies. Implants of this variety are also not recommended for diabetic patients who don't have good control over their blood sugar due to the increased risk for infection and poor healing. Endosseous implant patients should have good quality and quantity of bone with no surgical contraindications. The aim of this invention is to reduce complications of implant failure and help clinicians in placing implants less painfully. This Deep Socket Dental Implant Capsule invention is for preservation of the socket immediately after extraction minimizing the difficulty m osseointegration of implant to the bone. Failure of implants is prevented by checking the bone and socket implant integration.

Patent Information

Application ID202441082022
Invention FieldBIO-MEDICAL ENGINEERING
Date of Application28/10/2024
Publication Number46/2024

Inventors

NameAddressCountryNationality
Deepak Nallaswamy VeeraiyanNo: 162, POONAMALLE HIGH ROAD, VELLAPANCHAVADI, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA, PIN CODE-600077.IndiaIndia
Thiyaneswaran.NNo: 162, POONAMALLE HIGH ROAD, VELLAPANCHAVADI, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA, PIN CODE-600077.IndiaIndia
M. Vijay AnandNo: 162, POONAMALLE HIGH ROAD, VELLAPANCHAVADI, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA, PIN CODE-600077.IndiaIndia

Applicants

NameAddressCountryNationality
SAVEETHA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND TECHNICAL SCIENCESNo: 162, POONAMALLE HIGH ROAD, VELLAPANCHAVADI, CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, INDIA, PIN CODE-600077.IndiaIndia

Specification

INTRODUCTION
Dental implant growth throughout history is a rich and fascinating time travel
adventure. Dental implants have been used by people to repair missing teeth in one
way or another since the dawn of civilization. Dr. Per-Ingvar Briinemark
unintentionally discovered that titanium implants had a higher success rate in 1952,
which created the groundwork for current dental implants. He implanted a piece of
titanium into the femur of a rabbit, but when he tried to remove it, the titanium had
already fused with the bone. After more testing, he successfully used titanium to
restore a lost tooth for one of his patients. This was a significant development for the
dental implant market. He then published a number of studies outlining the
advantages of titanium use in dental implants. Dental implants have evolved over
time to become what they are now thanks to Dr. Per-Ingvar Branemark.
Endosseous dental implants have drastically changed how the teeth of individuals
who are edentulous or partially edentulous can be restored. The high survival rates
reported for single and multiple missing tooth replacements have demonstrated the
effectiveness of implant-supported restorations as an approach for oral
rehabilitation. Implants can restore a single missing tooth without the need to replace
the teeth next to it. Additionally, implants make it possible to provide fixed
restorations for those who are completely or partially edentulous. Patients who have
certain implants may experience failure within six months, severe bone loss, and
problems and deformities that are irreversible.
From 4.3% after five years to 26.4% after I 0 years, the frequency of connectionrelated
problems (screw loosening or fracture) increased. Of the 9% of restorations
that were cemented, loss of retention of the restorations occurred in 6.2% within five years and 24.9% ithin 10 years. Ironically, the "prevention" of these problems from
happening is the "therapy" for the issue of an increasing incidence of complications.
Complication risk can be decreased through improved case selection, awareness of
systemic issues that may lead to complications, and better treatment planning. The
clinician can achieve more predictable planning, placement, and restoration of
implant-supported restorations using available technology and diagnostic tools, such
as computed axial tomography (CAT) scans, cone-beam (CB) scans, surgical guides,
computer treatment planning, and aids to assess primary implant stability (i.e.,
Periotest and Osstell).


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
HISTORY
Per-Ingvar Branemark! (3 May 1929-30 December 2014) was a Swedish physician
and researcher, known as.the "father of modem dental implantology".
Leonard Linkow,, in the 1950s, was one of the first to insert titanium and other metal
implants into the bones of the jaw. Artificial teeth were then attached to these pieces
of metal. In 1965 Branemark placed his first titanium dental implant into a human
volunteer.
Some of the earliest attempts at dental implants date back to the ancient world. These
tooth replacement attempts show an attempt to fill the spaces left behind by missing
teeth, in people both living and dead. 4,000 Years Ago- bamboo pegs were used to
fill the spaces left by missing teeth.

OBJECTIVES
1. To avoid motor driven technique for placement of implant.
2. To promote socket preservation after extraction.
3. osseointegration to be reviewed before loading of implants.
Summary of the Invention
The Deep Socket Dental Implant Capsule can be placed immediate after an
extraction to preserve the socket. It helps in socket preservation. No Motor driven
technique used for placement of implant capsule. The unique octagon shaped
external beak surface helps in engaging the bone. Artificial bone can be filled to
the octahedral cubes of the implant capsule external surface. After healing period
the implant capsule to bone osseointegration can be reviewed. If osseointegration is
Satisfactory then abutment can be threaded to the implant. This Deep Socket
Dental Implant Capsule invention is for preservation of the socket immediately
after extraction minimizing the difficulty in osseointegration of implant to the
bone. Failure of implants is· prevented by checking the bone and socket implant
integration.
The use of implants is widespread and likely to increase over the next years, which
suggests that dental professionals will deal with implant failure and associated
consequences more frequently. One must identify the cause to treat the current
condition and gain knowledge for future therapies. Timely intervention is always
possible with routine checkups. Minimizing the number and severity of issues that
will unavoidably arise requires knowledge, learning, and experience. Unfortunately,
~ it is all too true that the final examination frequently comes first, followed by the
N
~ less~n,_w_h-ich-ith~e pr-o-l·e·m wi-th utilizing experience as a guide.

Detailed Description
Dental implant failure is also classified on the basis oflocal and systemic factors as
well.
Local causes
The most frequent and avoidable cause of dental implant failure is infection. At any
moment over the course of implant therapy, a bacterial infection that results in
implant failures can happen. Peri-implantitis is a term used to describe an
inflammatory response with bone loss in the soft tissues surrounding implants. The
concept ofperi-implantitis could include plaque-induced infection caused by plaque
building up on the exposed surfaces of the biomaterial. Although bacterial insult is
the most prevalent cause of peri-mucositis, stress factors caused by a poor
biomechanical environment are considered to be the cause of peri-implantitis.
Fistulations, mucosal abscesses, and hyperplastic mucositis are other soft tissue
problems that appear to be mostly infectious in origin. In connection with loose
prosthetic components, fistulas and hyperplastic mucositis are frequently observed .
Food particles stuck in the peri-implant crevice can occasionally cause abscesses.
Implant failures associated with delayed healing are thought to be greatly influenced
by the severity of the surgical trauma (lack of irrigation and overheating),
micromotion, and several local and systemic features of the host. Overload-related
implant failures occur when the functional load placed on the implants is greater
than what the bone can bear. In addition to the severe loading circumstances, poor
surgical technique, low bone quality, and poor prosthesis design are additional
factors contributing to implant failures.

Management of Local Causes of Implant Failure
The initial step in treatment is to detect and diagnose the malfunctioning implant.
Mobility, edema, discomfort, pus, bleeding, and radiographic evidence of periimplant
bone loss are the possible clinical indications and symptoms of implant
failure. Any time there is obvious mobility following implant failure, the implant
needs to be removed right away. To prevent further alveolar bone loss that would
make the alternative of replacing the failed implant with a new one more
challenging, it is crucial to recognize a failing implant as soon as possible. The
patient should be motivated to perform an adequate level of plaque control on a
regular basis. If an implant does fail or is unable to form bone around it, the most
important thing is its rapid removal to avoid more bone loss because if the implant
is left, more and more bone will be lost in order to place another implant. The
possible treatment options for implant failure include the replacement of a faulty
implant right away with one with a larger diameter, simultaneous replacement of
failed implant with a guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure, and a staged
approach where the lost tissue is first rebuilt and the implant is then placed following
site healing (delayed approach).
Peri-Implantitis
Peri-implantitis is a plaque-associated pathological disease that occurs in the tissues
surrounding dental implants characterized by inflammation in the peri-implant
mucosa and consequent gradual bone loss. Bacteria and food particles that build
around dental implants and gum lines cause peri-implantitis. As a result, periimplantitis
often goes undiagnosed in its early stages. It is an inflammatory lesion
that causes obvious bone loss; the marginal soft tissue will appear inflamed Bacterial colonization is one of the prime factors that may be induced due to poor
oral hygiene, cements retained in the subgingival area, and microscopic gaps
between implant components. Some of the signs of this condition include pain
around the dental implant area, swollen lymph nodes, an unpleasant aftertaste,
bleeding at the gum line, and slight movement of the dental implant.
Fractured implants can be removed by means of trephines. After this, a new implant
can be placed at the same time. The dental surgeon should pay attention to the
diameter of the trephine because it can affect the primary stability of the new
implant. Apicoectomy is a useful procedure for simultaneously removing fractured
implants and placing fresh implants. This method involved making a hole in the bone
to better see the shattered implant's apical fragments and remove those fragments
via the hole. After that, a new implant is placed as usual, and the hole is filled with
the patient's own bone that was previously taken.





CLAIMS
II We Claim,
Claim I : A Deep Socket Dental Implant Capsule , said Deep Socket
Dental Implant Capsule includes:
Head (2),
Body (5),
Tail (8),
External hex (1 ),
Internal Hex (7),
Octagon Cube (6),
Internal thread (3),
Head External thread (10),
Abutment (9), .
Abutment External thread (10)
Claim 2: Deep Socket Dental Implant Capsule of Claim I, Wherein Deep
Socket Dental Implant Capsule comprises plurality of implant sizes
respectively.
Claim 3: Deep Socket Dental Implant· Capsule of Claim I, Wherein Head
(2) comprises External Hex (I) for threading the component to the implant
capsule.
Claim 4: Deep Socket Dental Implant Capsule ofC!aim 1, Wherein body
(5) comprises plurality of Octagon cube (6) respectively.
Claim 5: Deep Socket Dental Implant Capsule ofClaim I, Wherein body 5) comprises of Internal Hex (7) for retrieval of the implant and Internal thread
Q)
(3) for receiving the abutment (9) respectively

Documents

NameDate
202441082022-Form 1-281024.pdf07/11/2024
202441082022-Form 18-281024.pdf07/11/2024
202441082022-Form 2(Title Page)-281024.pdf07/11/2024
202441082022-Form 3-281024.pdf07/11/2024
202441082022-Form 5-281024.pdf07/11/2024
202441082022-Form 9-281024.pdf07/11/2024

footer-service

By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service,Cookie PolicyPrivacy Policy  and  Refund Policy  © - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.

Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited, CIN - U74900TN2014PTC098414, GSTIN - 33AABCU7650C1ZM, Registered Office Address - F-97, Newry Shreya Apartments Anna Nagar East, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600102, India.

Please note that we are a facilitating platform enabling access to reliable professionals. We are not a law firm and do not provide legal services ourselves. The information on this website is for the purpose of knowledge only and should not be relied upon as legal advice or opinion.